Skip to main content

Week 4

 "Seeing Ourselves Through Technology"

One thing I couldn't look over in this reading is how Rettberg illustrates how seamlessly surveillance has threaded itself into everyday life. She traces surveillance all the way back to when it was used as a tool of social order, such as early identification documents, and how that has turned into something far more invasive with digital technology's rising power. What may appear as simple data collection, quickly turns into a method of control. This ties back to Foucault's idea of panopticism, Rettberg highlights the idea that even if we don't know when or if we are being watched, the possibility of us being monitored shapes our behaviors. Our phones, social media accounts, and even platforms we use for work or school remind us that our actions leave a trace, and that trace can be easily accessed.

Rettberg mentions the troubling reality of data rights. Some countries have stronger protections, but in North American users often trade away their privacy without realizing it. Just with downloading an app and using it, we agree to terms that give organizations a concerning amount of power over our personal information. But what is even more concerning is the permanence of this data. Rettberg warns that children today will graduate with a digital footprint larger than any generation that came before them. Even though there is a chance that laws evolve, there is little people can do to truly erase this data.

I found Rettbergs description of "dataveillance" especially striking. In contrast to traditional surveillance that relied on visual observation like cameras, guards, etc, dataveillance works invisibly. When users click, post, or swipe we are feeding into systems that collect this information and build detailed profiles of who we are. While it can be argued that these profiles are useful for improving platforms or catching fraud, Rettberg emphasizes the dark side. The idea that companies are primarily using them to predict and influence consumer behavior. Very similar to Marwick's idea, we are not just being watched, but are being shaped and sold back to ourselves.

It seems everyone knows that companies take information from us, and no one seems to care. As the shift from visual surveillance to dataveillance increases, and the systems become more invisible, the less it gets questioned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2

"How One Stupid Tweet Ruined Justine Sacco's Life" This week's article looked at the severity of one's digital footprint. I picked up on how unforgiving the internet is. The story shows how once a person is branded online, they are branded forever. Years later, Sacco's name is still tied to that tweet. Such permanence feels out of proportion to the mistake. If the internet stays on this track, we may be fostering a culture of fear instead of one that encourages growth and learning. Additionally, this reading shows how intent is fragile once brought online. It is often difficult to express emotions like sarcasm through a computer screen, especially once detached from tone or context. Sacco claimed she was mocking ignorance, but her sarcasm collapsed once put online. Once she made her post, all that mattered was how the internet interpreted her words, regardless of what she meant. This gap between intent and perception is never-racking, because it suggests any o...

Week 1

"Orwell's 'Big Brother' is already in millions of homes. Her name is Alexa"  This article resonated with me because my house is filled with Alexas, controlling our lights, music, alarms, garage, and more. I'm less shocked by how much I'm monitored than by how comfortable I've become with it. In the article, a subject explains how at first, he felt uncomfortable by Google Home, and how actively it was listening, but within days he completely forgot. The normalization of always being listened to by a robot is alarming, we have been trading safety for convenience.  It also made me question who actually has access to all this data. We're told that devices like Alexa or Google Home, only "wake" with a keyword, but what are they doing while they're listening for it? With my home run by Alexa, could even something like my thermostat data end up in the hands of corporations or hackers without me knowing? This isn't a new thought of mine, ...